Conga vs Agiloft: Which One Should You Choose for CLM?

Conga Alternative vs Agiloft Alternative: Which One is Best?

Choosing between Conga vs Agiloft for contract lifecycle management can make or break how fast your business closes deals and manages risk.

Are you looking for Conga and Agiloft alternatives for contract management? Fortva is the best choice—a single source of truth for contract lifecycle management that is easy to use, affordable, and built with transparent pricing. With seamless DocuSign and Microsoft integrations, unlimited storage, unlimited users, and flexible custom integrations, Fortva helps you scale without complexity. It’s designed for fast onboarding, real collaboration, and enterprise-grade security—without enterprise headaches.

Key Takeaways

  • Conga CLM is powerful but often comes with complex implementation and high total cost of ownership, especially for Salesforce-heavy environments.
  • Agiloft CLM stands out for customization and no-code workflows, but requires time, expertise, and internal resources to fully leverage.
  • Both platforms are enterprise-focused, which can lead to long onboarding cycles and steep learning curves.
  • Businesses searching for Conga CLM alternatives or Agiloft competitors often prioritize ease of use, transparent pricing, and faster ROI.
  • Fortva delivers a modern, AI-powered CLM experience with faster deployment, intuitive workflows, and scalable pricing—making it ideal for both SMBs and enterprise teams.

Conga vs Agiloft vs Fortva  Comparison Table

Feature / Capability Conga CLM Agiloft CLM Fortva CLM (Winner)
Ease of Use Complex, requires training and Salesforce familiarity Flexible but not intuitive; steep learning curve Modern, intuitive UI built for instant adoption across teams
Implementation Time 3–9 months with consultants عدة weeks to months depending on customization Go live in weeks with minimal setup
User Adoption Low to moderate due to complexity Moderate; depends on training High adoption due to simplicity and familiar workflows
Customization Limited outside Salesforce ecosystem अत्यधिक customizable (but complex) Flexible without complexity—prebuilt + configurable workflows
Integration Capabilities Strong with Salesforce, limited flexibility beyond واسعة but requires configuration Seamless integrations (Microsoft, DocuSign, Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier)
Contract Creation Template-based, CRM-driven Custom workflows, requires setup Fast, automated contract generation with templates + AI assistance
AI & Automation موجود but often requires setup AI available but not always user-friendly Built-in AI + OCR for risk detection, data extraction, and workflow automation
Collaboration Limited, not very user-friendly Functional but not intuitive Real-time collaboration, redlining, version control in one place
Document Management (DMS) Not native; often requires additional tools Available but not unified Fully integrated DMS + CLM (single source of truth)
Storage Limits Often tier-based Depends on pricing plan Unlimited storage included
User Limits Per-user licensing (expensive at scale) Per-user pricing Unlimited users at no extra cost
Pricing Transparency Opaque, custom quotes, hidden costs Custom pricing, hard to predict Transparent, predictable, scalable pricing
Total Cost of Ownership High (licenses + consultants + maintenance) Medium to high (configuration cost) Low and predictable with no hidden fees
Security Enterprise-grade Enterprise-grade Military-grade zero-knowledge encryption + full control
Scalability Enterprise-focused but expensive Highly scalable but complex Scales effortlessly without increasing complexity or cost
Best For Salesforce-heavy enterprises Highly technical teams needing customization SMBs + enterprises needing speed, simplicity, and ROI
Time to ROI Slow due to long deployment Moderate Fast ROI due to quick onboarding and ease of use

 Conga vs Agiloft CLM 

When comparing Conga vs Agiloft CLM, you’re essentially evaluating two enterprise-grade contract lifecycle management systems that approach the same problem differently. Both aim to streamline contract creation, negotiation, execution, and renewal—but how they deliver that value varies significantly.

Conga vs Agiloft: Which One Should You Choose for CLM?
Source:g2.com

 

According to a 2024 report by World Commerce & Contracting, inefficient contract management can cost businesses up to 9.2% of annual revenue, largely due to missed obligations, poor visibility, and manual processes. This is why choosing the right CLM platform is not just a software decision—it’s a revenue decision. Let’s break down both platforms in depth.

Conga CLM

Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (formerly Apttus CLM) is a well-known enterprise CLM solution designed to streamline contract processes, particularly within the Salesforce ecosystem. It is widely recognized for its deep integration with CRM workflows and its ability to automate sales-driven contract processes.

Best For:

  • Large enterprises heavily using Salesforce CRM
  • Sales-driven organizations with complex quote-to-cash processes
  • Teams requiring deep automation across revenue operations

Key Features:

  • Salesforce-native integration
    Conga’s strongest differentiator is its tight integration with Salesforce, allowing sales teams to generate contracts directly from CRM data. This reduces manual entry but also creates dependency on the Salesforce ecosystem.
  • Automated contract generation
    Users can create contracts using pre-approved templates, clauses, and dynamic data fields, reducing drafting time and ensuring compliance.
  • Workflow automation and approvals
    Conga enables multi-step approval workflows that route contracts through legal, finance, and management teams automatically.
  • Clause library and contract templates
    A centralized repository ensures consistency in contract language while reducing legal risk.
  • Advanced reporting and analytics
    Conga offers insights into contract performance, cycle times, and revenue impact—though customization can require technical expertise.

Pros of Conga CLM

  • Deep Salesforce integration improves sales efficiency
  • Strong automation capabilities for enterprise workflows
  • Scalable for large organizations with complex needs
  • Robust contract generation features

Cons of Conga CLM

  • Implementation can take months, requiring consultants and technical resources
  • Heavy reliance on Salesforce ecosystem limits flexibility
  • User interface can feel outdated and complex
  • High pricing structure with hidden costs (licenses, customization, support)

Pricing

Conga CLM uses custom pricing, typically based on user count, integrations, and deployment complexity. Many organizations report that the total cost of ownership increases significantly due to implementation, training, and ongoing customization.

Use Cases

Conga is best suited for organizations that need tight alignment between sales and legal teams. For example, a global SaaS company managing thousands of contracts monthly can benefit from Conga’s automation—provided they already operate within Salesforce.

What Users Are Saying (G2, Capterra, GetApp)

Users often praise Conga for its powerful automation and Salesforce integration. However, common concerns include:

  • Long implementation timelines
  • Complex user experience
  • Expensive licensing and customization
  • Dependence on external consultants

Many reviews highlight that while Conga is powerful, it can be overkill for mid-sized businesses looking for simplicity and speed.

Agiloft CLM 

Agiloft is a highly customizable contract lifecycle management platform known for its no-code architecture and flexibility. Unlike Conga, Agiloft positions itself as a platform that can be tailored to virtually any business process without heavy coding.

Conga vs Agiloft: Which One Should You Choose for CLM?
Source:g2.com

Best For:

  • Enterprises requiring high customization and flexibility
  • Legal teams managing complex workflows and compliance requirements
  • Organizations looking for a no-code CLM platform

Key Features:

  • No-code workflow automation
    Agiloft allows users to design workflows without coding, enabling faster adaptation to business needs—though it still requires planning and expertise.
  • Highly configurable data model
    Users can customize fields, objects, and relationships to match their contract processes.
  • AI-powered contract analytics
    Agiloft uses AI to extract key contract data, identify risks, and provide insights.
  • Centralized contract repository
    All contracts are stored in a searchable database with version control and audit trails.
  • Integration capabilities
    Agiloft integrates with CRM, ERP, and document management systems, though setup can require configuration effort.

Pros of Agiloft CLM

  • Extremely flexible and customizable
  • No-code platform reduces dependency on developers
  • Strong compliance and audit capabilities
  • Good for complex contract environments

Cons of Agiloft CLM

  • Requires significant setup and configuration time
  • User interface is not as intuitive as modern SaaS tools
  • Learning curve can be steep for non-technical users
  • Customization can become overwhelming without proper governance

Pricing

Agiloft also follows a custom pricing model, which depends on the number of users, features, and deployment complexity. While flexible, the lack of transparent pricing makes budgeting difficult for many organizations.

Use Cases

Agiloft is often used by enterprises with highly specialized workflows, such as government agencies, healthcare organizations, and legal-heavy industries that require compliance tracking and contract governance.

What Users Are Saying (G2, Capterra, GetApp)

Users appreciate Agiloft’s flexibility and ability to adapt to unique processes. However, common feedback includes:

  • Time-intensive setup and configuration
  • Steep learning curve
  • Interface not as user-friendly as competitors
  • Requires dedicated internal resources or consultants

Some users mention that Agiloft feels more like a platform to build a CLM, rather than a ready-to-use solution.

Why Businesses Are Searching for Conga and Agiloft Alternatives

The demand for Conga CLM alternatives and Agiloft competitors has grown rapidly as businesses shift toward faster, more agile contract management solutions.

A 2025 Gartner report indicates that over 60% of CLM implementations fail to meet expected ROI within the first year, often due to complexity, poor user adoption, and long deployment cycles. This is where modern platforms like Fortva come in.

Fortva: Alternative to Conga and Agiloft

Fortva is not just another CLM tool—it’s a next-generation contract lifecycle management platform designed to eliminate the complexity that slows businesses down.

Unlike traditional enterprise CLM systems, Fortva combines ease of use, AI-powered automation, and transparent pricing into a single platform.

Laserfiche alternative-Document-Management-Process-Automation

What Makes Fortva Superior?

Fortva is built for both enterprise legal teams and fast-growing businesses, delivering value from day one.

Unified Document & Contract Management

Fortva goes beyond CLM by combining document management (DMS) and contract lifecycle management into a single platform. This creates a true single source of truth for all business-critical documents.

AI-Powered Automation & Insights

Fortva uses AI and intelligent OCR to extract key data from contracts, automate workflows, and identify risks—helping teams make faster, smarter decisions.

Seamless Integrations

With integrations like Microsoft Word, DocuSign, Salesforce, HubSpot, and Zapier, Fortva connects contracts directly to your business workflows.

Enterprise-Grade Security

Fortva offers military-grade zero-knowledge encryption, ensuring that your data remains secure and compliant.

Unlimited Scalability

Unlike Conga and Agiloft, Fortva offers:

  • Unlimited users
  • Unlimited storage
  • Transparent, scalable pricing

Real Business Impact

Companies using modern CLM platforms report:

  • 50% faster contract cycle times
  • 30% reduction in legal workload
  • 20% increase in revenue realization

Fortva is designed to deliver these results without the complexity of traditional CLM systems.

Why Fortva Is Emerging as the Best CLM Choice 

If Conga and Agiloft represent the old guard of contract lifecycle management, then Fortva represents the next evolution of CLM—built for speed, simplicity, and real business impact.

The reality is this: most companies today are no longer looking for just a “powerful” CLM system—they are looking for a platform that delivers value fast, scales effortlessly, and doesn’t require months of implementation or six-figure budgets. This is exactly where Fortva turns the tables.

The Shift in CLM: From Complexity to Usability

For years, enterprise CLM tools like Conga and Agiloft have dominated the market by offering deep functionality. But that functionality often comes at a cost—complex deployments, heavy customization, and low user adoption.

A 2025 IDC report found that nearly 70% of enterprise software projects experience delays due to implementation complexity, while over 50% of users admit they underutilize CLM systems because they are too difficult to navigate. Fortva was built to solve this exact problem.

Instead of forcing businesses to adapt to software, Fortva is designed to adapt to how businesses actually work—across legal, sales, procurement, and operations.

Fortva: A True All-in-One CLM and DMS Platform

Unlike Conga and Agiloft, which often require multiple tools or integrations to achieve full functionality, Fortva combines contract lifecycle management (CLM) and document management (DMS) into a single unified platform. This means businesses no longer need to juggle disconnected systems for:

  • Contract creation
  • Document storage
  • Collaboration
  • Workflow automation
  • E-signatures

Everything lives in one secure, centralized environment—creating a true single source of truth. This unified approach is not just convenient—it’s strategic. According to McKinsey, organizations that centralize document and contract processes can improve productivity by 20–30%.

How Audit Trail Is Used to Track Changes in Document Management — A Complete GuideBuilt for Speed: Implementation in Weeks, Not Months

One of the biggest pain points with Conga and Agiloft is the time-to-value. It’s not uncommon for enterprises to spend 3–9 months implementing CLM systems, involving consultants, developers, and extensive training. During this time, teams continue to rely on manual processes—losing both time and revenue. Fortva eliminates this bottleneck. With its intuitive interface and pre-configured workflows, Fortva enables businesses to:

  • Go live in a matter of weeks
  • Onboard teams quickly without extensive training
  • Start managing contracts immediately

This faster deployment directly translates into faster ROI, which is a critical factor for both SMBs and enterprise teams under pressure to deliver results.

Designed for Humans, Not Just Systems

One of the most overlooked aspects of CLM software is user experience. Conga and Agiloft are often described as powerful—but not necessarily easy to use. This creates a gap between what the system can do and what users actually use.

Fortva bridges this gap with a modern, intuitive interface that requires minimal learning curve. Instead of navigating complex menus and configurations, users can:

  • Draft contracts directly within familiar tools like Microsoft Word
  • Collaborate in real time with internal and external stakeholders
  • Track approvals and changes without confusion
  • Access contracts instantly through advanced search

This focus on usability leads to higher adoption rates—and ultimately, better business outcomes. A Forrester study found that user-friendly enterprise software increases adoption rates by up to 3x, directly impacting ROI.

AI That Works for You 

While many CLM platforms claim to offer AI capabilities, they often fall short in practical application.

Fortva takes a different approach by embedding AI and intelligent OCR directly into the workflow, making automation both accessible and impactful. With Fortva, businesses can:

  • Automatically extract key contract data (dates, clauses, obligations)
  • Identify potential risks and compliance issues
  • Trigger workflows based on contract conditions
  • Gain actionable insights from contract analytics

This is not just automation—it’s intelligent contract management that reduces manual effort and enhances decision-making.

According to Deloitte, organizations using AI in contract management see up to 40% reduction in contract review time.

Seamless Integrations That Actually Work

Conga’s strength lies in Salesforce integration, while Agiloft offers flexible integrations—but often with configuration challenges.

Fortva combines the best of both worlds by offering plug-and-play integrations with the tools businesses already use:

  • Microsoft Word for document creation
  • DocuSign for e-signatures
  • Salesforce and HubSpot for CRM integration
  • Zapier for workflow automation

This ensures that contracts are not isolated—they are fully integrated into your customer lifecycle and business processes. The result? Faster deal cycles, fewer errors, and better alignment between teams.

Transparent Pricing That Scales With You

One of the most common frustrations with Conga and Agiloft is pricing opacity. Custom quotes, hidden costs, and expensive add-ons make it difficult for businesses to predict their total investment. As companies scale, these costs can increase dramatically. Fortva takes a radically different approach.

With transparent, scalable pricing, businesses know exactly what they are paying for—without surprises. Even more importantly, Fortva offers:

  • Unlimited users
  • Unlimited storage
  • No hidden fees for essential features

This makes Fortva not only more affordable but also more predictable—an essential factor for growing businesses.

Enterprise-Grade Security Without Compromise

Security is non-negotiable in contract management, especially for organizations dealing with sensitive legal and financial data.

Fortva delivers military-grade, zero-knowledge encryption, ensuring that only authorized users can access your data. Combined with:

  • Role-based permissions
  • Audit trails
  • Secure document sharing
  • Compliance-ready architecture

Fortva provides the level of security expected from enterprise solutions—without the complexity.

Use Cases Of Fortva

Fortva is designed to support a wide range of industries and use cases, including:

  • Sales teams closing deals faster with automated contract generation
  • Legal teams managing risk and compliance with AI-driven insights
  • Procurement teams streamlining vendor agreements
  • SMBs scaling operations without increasing administrative overhead

What makes Fortva unique is its ability to serve both mid-market companies and enterprise organizations without compromise.

What Modern Users Expect 

Today’s buyers are more informed than ever. They don’t just compare features—they compare outcomes. Across review platforms and industry reports, users consistently prioritize:

  • Ease of use
  • Fast implementation
  • Transparent pricing
  • Strong support
  • Real ROI

This is where Fortva consistently outperforms traditional CLM platforms. While Conga and Agiloft focus on capability, Fortva focuses on usability + value + speed—the three pillars of modern software success.

Fortva vs Conga vs Agiloft

When you step back and look at the bigger picture, the difference becomes clear. Conga and Agiloft are designed for organizations willing to invest time, money, and resources into building and maintaining complex systems. Fortva is designed for organizations that want to:

  • Move faster
  • Reduce complexity
  • Increase adoption
  • Maximize ROI

Manage your contracts like a champ—you will never miss deadlines anymore.

If you’re not using a better contract management system, someone else is. Request a CLM demo to see how Fortva works as an excellent Conga and Agiloft CLM competitor. Our team will demonstrate how Fortva delivers faster implementation, practical AI risk analysis, and superior value compared to custom Conga and Agiloft pricing models.

You can also explore Fortva CLM pricing and plans to understand our transparent cost structure and how it compares to enterprise Conga CLM pricing.

Get S E T, G O

76% of participants in a survey by Deloitte identified a current need to implement new technology. Now is the time for you to do the same and invest in a smart DMS and CLM.

Whether you are at the beginning, middle, or advanced stage of your CLM journey, Fortva has the experts and technology to help.

Start a free trial or book a demo today.

 

Frequently Asked Questions — Conga vs Agiloft

1. What is the difference between Conga CLM and Agiloft CLM?

Conga CLM is deeply integrated with Salesforce and focuses on sales-driven contract automation.
Agiloft CLM is a no-code, highly customizable platform suited for complex workflows.
Conga is ideal for CRM-heavy environments, while Agiloft fits legal-heavy operations.
However, both can be complex—modern alternatives like Fortva offer simpler, faster deployment.

2. Which is better: Conga CLM or Agiloft CLM?

The answer depends on your business needs and technical capacity.
Conga is better for Salesforce users, while Agiloft excels in customization.
Both require time, resources, and expertise to fully implement.
Many businesses now choose Fortva for faster ROI and ease of use.

3. Is Conga CLM only for Salesforce users?

Conga works best within the Salesforce ecosystem and is heavily optimized for it.
While it can integrate with other systems, its full power relies on Salesforce.
This dependency can limit flexibility for non-Salesforce users.
Fortva offers broader integrations without locking you into one ecosystem.

4. Is Agiloft CLM really no-code?

Agiloft is marketed as a no-code platform, allowing workflow customization without coding.
However, effective setup still requires planning, configuration, and expertise.
Non-technical users may find it challenging at first.
Fortva simplifies this with prebuilt workflows that require minimal setup.

5. How much does Conga CLM cost?

Conga CLM uses custom pricing based on users, features, and integrations.
Costs often increase due to implementation, support, and customization fees.
Many businesses report high total cost of ownership over time.
Fortva provides transparent pricing with no hidden costs.

6. How much does Agiloft CLM cost?

Agiloft also follows a custom pricing model tailored to each organization.
Pricing depends on configuration complexity, users, and deployment scope.
This makes budgeting difficult for many companies.
Fortva offers predictable, scalable pricing that grows with your business.

7. What are the main disadvantages of Conga CLM?

Conga CLM can be complex to implement and requires technical expertise.
Its heavy reliance on Salesforce limits flexibility.
Users often report a steep learning curve and slower adoption.
Fortva eliminates these issues with simplicity and faster onboarding.

8. What are the main disadvantages of Agiloft CLM?

Agiloft requires significant setup time and configuration effort.
Its flexibility can become overwhelming without proper governance.
The user interface is not as intuitive as modern platforms.
Fortva delivers flexibility without complexity, improving usability.

9. How long does it take to implement Conga or Agiloft?

Conga implementations can take several months, especially in large enterprises.
Agiloft may be faster but still requires weeks to months depending on customization.
Both often require consultants or dedicated internal resources.
Fortva can be implemented in weeks with minimal disruption.

10. What is the best alternative to Conga CLM and Agiloft?

Businesses are increasingly looking for faster, easier CLM solutions.
The best alternatives offer simplicity, automation, and transparent pricing.
Fortva stands out with AI-powered workflows and all-in-one CLM + DMS.
It delivers enterprise capabilities without the complexity of legacy systems.

11. Which CLM software is easiest to use?

Ease of use is a major factor in CLM success and user adoption.
Conga and Agiloft are powerful but often require training.
Complex interfaces can slow down teams and reduce efficiency.
Fortva is designed for intuitive use, enabling teams to work faster.

12. Do Conga and Agiloft support e-signatures?

Yes, both platforms support e-signatures through integrations.
Conga integrates well with DocuSign, especially within Salesforce.
Agiloft also supports e-signature tools but may require setup.
Fortva offers seamless DocuSign integration built directly into workflows.

13. Can CLM software improve contract turnaround time?

Yes, CLM software significantly reduces contract cycle times.
Automation eliminates manual drafting, approvals, and tracking.
However, complex systems can slow down adoption and impact results.
Fortva accelerates turnaround with AI automation and intuitive workflows.

14. Is CLM software worth the investment?

Inefficient contract management can cost businesses up to 9% of revenue.
CLM software improves visibility, compliance, and efficiency.
The key is choosing a solution that delivers fast ROI.
Fortva ensures value quickly with simple implementation and powerful features.

15. What should I look for in a CLM solution?

Look for ease of use, automation, integration, and scalability.
Avoid platforms that require heavy customization or long deployments.
Transparent pricing and fast onboarding are critical for success.
Fortva checks all these boxes, making it a future-ready CLM solution.

Fortva Avatar

Fortva is an AI-powered document management and contract lifecycle management (CLM) platform helping modern enterprises take control of their contracts—from creation to renewal. Built for HR, legal, procurement, sales, and finance teams, Fortva combines intelligent automation, contract analytics, and workflow orchestration to eliminate bottlenecks and reduce risk. With advanced capabilities like AI-driven extraction, conversational search, and smart negotiation insights, Fortva transforms contracts into strategic business assets.

Fact Checked & Editorial Guidelines

Our Fact Checking Process

We prioritize accuracy and integrity in our content. Here's how we maintain high standards:

  1. Expert Review: All articles are reviewed by subject matter experts.
  2. Source Validation: Information is backed by credible, up-to-date sources.
  3. Transparency: We clearly cite references and disclose potential conflicts.
Reviewed by: Subject Matter Experts

Our Review Board

Our content is carefully reviewed by experienced professionals to ensure accuracy and relevance.

  • Qualified Experts: Each article is assessed by specialists with field-specific knowledge.
  • Up-to-date Insights: We incorporate the latest research, trends, and standards.
  • Commitment to Quality: Reviewers ensure clarity, correctness, and completeness.

Look for the expert-reviewed label to read content you can trust.

Similar Posts